




Shades of color change with every step. As the angles and intensity of light changes what we see evolves.
Oracle Team USA, the defender in the America’s Cup, could be in serious trouble.
Having already admitted rules violations during the America’s Cup World Series, a warm-up to this year’s regatta, the team has been described by a Cup committee as having made “an intentional effort’’ to circumvent the rules.
And on Tuesday, Oracle’s chief rival directly accused the American team of cheating. “You can’t actually get to any other point than the fact they were cheating,’’ Emirates Team New Zealand managing director Grant Dalton said in an interview. “I think it’s really serious.’’
Oracle could wind up forfeiting one or more race wins in the best-of-17 America’s Cup finals, or it could be thrown out of the regatta altogether, an international sailing expert said.
A five-member international jury “could dismiss them from the event, which would hand the trophy to the winner of the Louis Vuitton (challengers) Cup,’’ said Bob Fisher, an America’s Cup historian. “Still taking a strong line, they could give the Louis Vuitton Cup winner one or more wins in the America’s Cup finals. It depends on how strongly the jury feels about it.’’
The latest developments add to the troubles of a series plagued by soaring boat costs, a scarcity of challengers, a crash that killed a crew member, intense rules disagreements and one-sided races.
Meanwhile, with the major league baseball season entering the home stretch and the NFL exhibition season in full swing, the Louis Vuitton Cup is attracting scant attention in the Bay Area. The finals begin Saturday between Team New Zealand and Italy’s Luna Rossa Challenge.
Oracle admitted last week its shore members illegally placed weights in the bows of all three of its 45-foot catamarans during the America’s Cup World Series. One of the boats was loaned to a British team.
In a report to regatta director Iain Murray, the America’s Cup measurement committee said, “The modifications appear to be an intentional effort to circumvent the limitations of the 45 class rule.’’
The committee’s report was used as the basis of Murray’s filing a protest to the international jury of the International Sailing Federation. The jury is investigating the violations.
In disclosing the violations on Thursday, Oracle team chief executive Russell Coutts said a team employee, possibly more than one, added the weights without the knowledge of management. He called the placement “a ridiculous mistake’’ because “it didn’t affect the performance.’’
Oracle voluntarily forfeited its wins in four ACWS regattas and its two overall season championships.
In an interview, Dalton disputed Coutts’ contention that the weights didn’t affect the boats’ performance.
“Why would you actually do it, if it didn’t make a difference?’’ Dalton said. Properly placed extra weight does improve the performance of the boat, he said.
“Because of the design (of the 45) you like the weight forward,’’ he said. That’s why “you put one guy really far forward to keep the bow in the water.’’
He called Coutts’ insistence that management didn’t know about the placement of the weights “complete nonsense.’’ He said he felt Oracle was trying to “snow’’ people with its explanations.
“It’s inconceivable,’’ Dalton said, “that a shore crew member woke up one morning and decided it was a good idea — that management would think it was a good idea — that to make the boat faster you would put some weight in the boat, and then you’d come in to work one day and do it.’’
At Team New Zealand, for example, if someone were to add weights or move them around, the team would run tests to see if it would help performance or not, he said. He didn’t buy the idea that rogue employees committed violations on their own.
According to the measurement committee, a five-pound combination of lead and resin was found inside the bow strut on one Oracle boat. Bags of lead of roughly the same weight were found in similar positions on the other two boats.
Dalton said it’s possible that somebody placed several weights in the boats and, in removing them afterward, forgot about the telltale lead and resin. The weights were not discovered during the ACWS because detailed weight testing was not done on the AC45s, all of which were the same design, Murray said last week.
The violations were not discovered until July 26, when the boats were tested in preparation of the upcoming Red Bull Youth America’s Cup. If it hadn’t been for the youth sailing regatta, the violations probably would not have been discovered at all.
Asked last week to explain why it took two weeks after the violations were detected to disclose them, Coutts said, “We had to make sure it actually happened.’’ He did not elaborate.
Coutts was unavailable for comment Tuesday, a team spokesperson said. “We’re not going to be able to comment today,’’ she said.
Dalton steered clear of accusing Coutts personally. “I can only say that there’s a management failure,’’ he said.
Stephen Barclay, the American’s Cup chief executive, and Tom Ehman, the Cup director of external affairs, could not immediately be reached for comment.
Dalton said he didn’t expect the jury to take a long time to reach a decision. “We have absolute faith that the jury will get to the bottom of it,’’ he said.
He likened the use of illegal weights to bicyclists using performance enhancing drugs in the Tour de France.
He was asked why a team would take such a risk in a low-stakes event like the ACWS, far from a pinnacle like the Tour de France. Dalton replied, “I’m the wrong person to ask why. We didn’t do it. That’s a fair question: Why would you cheat? But there is no doubt that they did.’’
This is the class that started it all. A few years ago when the world championship was in Newport. Everyone who would potentially be involved in the America’s Cup filed through to look at these boats and learn. And remember Bob Fisher, who is in San Francisco was one of the first to sail “C” class cats; before solid wings and lifting foils of course.
The world championship will be in Falmouth UK in September. This is one of those must see events. I expect to see a record turnout with paul larsen, the world’s fastest man on water sailing a new boat.





I have been waiting for several years to make this drive. Really, as I have been reminded it would best be done over two days. It is, from Santa Rosa, a 4 hour drive to garberville. Then to drive slowly up the Avenue of the Giants, takes time, and now of course you are several hours further north. A healthy drive back.
This road which is the old route 101 is a rare opportunity to see the Redwoods easily and be awed by their majesty.
The return trip had an interesting moment when a wildfire alert was posted. By the time we arrived, it was well under control.






Photography is an accidental art, more than any other form. Either being in the right place at the right time; or seeing a color, shape, or angle that is pleasing. We see the world as reflected light and we process those images through our perception of what we think we are seeing.
Here are images in the morning in sonoma county.
I hope you might visit: http://www.stephenlirakisphotography.net to see my collected images.
The problem with the America’s Cup venue was painfully clear during the challenger racelast Saturday. As the teams approached the leeward gate on San Francisco Bay, leader Luna Rossa Challenge (ITA) chose the right mark and their opponent Artemis Racing (SWE) followed.
This was a must-win race for the Swedes. Lose and they are eliminated. But on San Francisco Bay, with a strong tide flooding, their best tactical option was to follow. For Artemis Racing to have chosen the left mark, that would have taken them straight into the mouth of the current.
“It is the San Francisco Bay playbook,” explained broadcast commentator Ken Read. “(In a flood tide), you have to play the tidal cone behind Alcatraz Island, and then split to the left hand side for relief along the shore. It doesn’t make for a lot of passing lanes when you’re behind because, quite frankly, the playbook is in place on the Bay every single day.”
Another problem for the trailing boat has been the race course boundaries. With a narrow course, getting leverage on the leader is limited. But with the tidal impact, the natural boundaries are as real as the course boundaries.
“These tight race courses with the boundaries take away a lot of options for the guy behind,” said Read, “but given the impact of the current, I’m not sure you can make them wider.”
So what will the tide be doing this weekend when the Louis Vuitton Cup challenger finalsbegin between Emirates Team New Zealand and Luna Ross Challenge? With two races a day on Saturday and Sunday between 1300-1500 PDT, there is a light ebb predicted.
This reversal, in both strength and direction, could make for a more interesting race. Oh gosh, we hope so.
Anyone who sails has been aware and wondering about this since san francisco was chosen as the venue; particularly in a match race scenario.
A previously confidential report by the Chairman of the Measurement Committee reveals that according to an internal inquiry by Oracle Team USA, one member of their sailing crew was involved along with three members of the team Shore crew in the AC45 Measurement incident which broke late last week.
The incident relates to the finding on July 26, that a builder supplied part of three AC45’s managed by America’s Cup Defenders Oracle Team USA, had been tampered with, and had over 2kgs of ballast added to it.
The discovery was made by boatbuilders working for America’s Cup Regatta Management (ACRM).
The amount of additional weight added is miniscule, and it is equally hard to understand why it would be located forward in the boat, however the point is that it was a breech of the class rules for the AC45 – which is a one design manufacturer supplied class.
The flipside of that situation is the time taken to clear off what should have been a very simple matter of the team identifying the people involved, the circumstances, and providing the Measurer with an explanation – all within 24 hours. Maybe they could have avoided the ignomy of withdrawing from the last four events of the America’s cup World Series, of which Oracle team USA had won three and finished second in the other.
Instead what should have been a minor error, has dragged on for over two weeks and now the investigatory phase of a Rule 69 Hearing has got underway involving a substantial number of the team members, at a time when they should be preparing for the Defence of the America’s Cup.
That situation is not of the Measurer’s or Jury’s making – but of Oracle Team USA. And their fans have got to ask why?
![]() |
|
Members from one of the two Oracle Team USA teams sailing in the America’s Cup World Series Naples 2013 – celebrate their success after the Final Race Day – Gilles Martin-Raget: AmericasCup© Click Here to view large photo
|
The AC45s were sailed in nine America’s Cup World Series Regattas in USA, UK and Europe as a preliminary to the America’s Cup Regatta currently being staged in San Francisco.
Late last week August 8, 2013 almost two weeks after the discovery of the use of unmeasured parts, Oracle Team USA issued a media statement saying that they had decided to withdraw from the last four rounds of the America’s Cup World Series after a Protest had been made by the Regatta Director, Iain Murray to the International Jury attaching a report from the Measurement Committee.
Murray’s accompanying note to the Jury requested confidentiality on the matter citing potential damage to the event, however this issue was put into the public domain four days later.
The Oracle Team USA media release did not mention that, while their offer to withdraw had been accepted by the Regatta Director, the matter was still subject to an investigation by the International Jury under the provisions of International Sailing Federation’s Racing Rules, and specifically Rule 69 dealing with Allegations of Gross Misconduct.
That investigation is currently underway in San Francisco, where various members of Oracle Team USA are being interviewed by the International Jury.
Class Measurement infringements often result in serious penalties, including suspension from the sport. The investigation will usually focus not just on those who are directly involved, but anyone who had knowledge of the infringement, and failed to take action.
The Full Report from the Measurement Committee, reporting to Iain Murray, the America’s Cup Regatta director reads:
On July 26, 2013, the Measurement Committee were notified by ACRM boat builders preparing AC45 yachts for the Youth Americas Cup that the forward kingpost belonging to the AC45 yacht Ben Ainslie Racing (boat 9 ex-Aleph) was unusually heavy. The Measurement Committee inspected and weighed this kingpost.
![]() |
|
Oracle Team USA celebrate on the podium in the San Francisco round of the ACWS in October. This was one of four regattas from which the team subsequently withdrew. – Guilain Grenier Oracle Team USA© Click Here to view large photo
|
The suspect forward kingpost appeared to have been filled with a resin/ballast slurry of some type. and weighed 3.744 kg.
The Measurement Committee inspected an AC45 kingpost that showed no evidence of having been modified, and found that it weighed 1.390 kg, a weight difference of approximately 2.35 kg
The Measurement Committee could not independently verify that the modified forward kingpost belonged to BAR, other than the fact that the BAR yacht did not have a forward kingpost installed while we were weighing the one reported to have been removed from that yacht.
We did not weigh forward kingposts from the other AC45 yachts belonging to OTUSA. but the ACRM boatbuilders reported to us that they were similarly heavy.
Later that afternoon we met with Richard Slater rules advisor to OTUSA and reported our findings. Mark Turner OTUSA construction manager, called me later that evening and said he would get to the bottom of the situation, but said he had no prior knowledge of it.
Between Friday 26th July and Wednesday July 31 the Measurement Committee chairman had several further conversations with both Mark Turner and Richard Slater about their in-house investigations.
Mark Turner confirmed that he had determined based on interviews that all three AC45 yachts competing in the ACWS and maintained by OTUSA (Boats 4 5 and 9) had been modified in a similar fashion and that boats 4 and 5 were modified by the insertion of bags of lead shot into the kingpost He further reported that he had identified the responsible persons which included a member or members of the shore team charged with the maintenance of the AC45 yachts as well as at least one member of the sailing team.
![]() |
|
The diagram supplied showing the ballast had been located in the forward kingpost –
|
Mr Turner also confirmed that to the best of his ability to determine, the modifications to boats 4 (Oracle Team USA Spithill) and 5 (Oracle team USA Coutts) had been made during or prior to the Newport ACWS regatta in June, 2’012.
Ben Ainslie Racing (boat 9) did not compete in an ACWS event while under the control of OTUSA until the first San Francisco regatta in August of 2012, so it is unknown to the Measurement Committee when that boat might have been modified.
The AC45 Class Rule C 1 5 prohibits modification to components of the yacht without permission from the Measurement Committee. Permitted modifications are posted on the official Noticeboard. No request has been made for modifications of this type nor would such permission be granted if it were to be requested.
The AC45 Rule 0.1 6 stipulates that corrector weights. if required, are to be fitted within 0 420m of the chain plate bulkheads. The forward kingpost does not fall within this permitted region.
The modifications appear to be intentional efforts to circumvent the limitations of the AC45 class rule, and are therefore serious in nature.
Nick Nicholson. Chairman
For the Measurement Committee
As a footnote, three of the current International Jury were involved in the apparently simple case, satrting in May 2005, leading to the 32nd America’s cup in Valencia, of determining whether a designer Phil Kaiko was entitled to leave one team (Mascalzone Latino) that had not at that time entered, but was formed and intending to do so. Kaiko wanted to join a Spanish team, El Reto.
The apparently simple case became complicated, eventually being decided in favour of Mascalzone Latino and cost El Reto an eye watering 134,000 Euro in Jury costs alone (of a total cost for the process of 180,000 Euro). In the end El Reto did not progress to the 32nd America’s Cup.
richard gladwell