CRIME AND PUNISHMENT: DIRK DE RIDDER

This is a story that I have followed with interest. I have always felt that the punishment handed out to Team Oracle during the America’s Cup was very strange.  A punishment handed out for something that occurred in a series that actually had nothing whatsoever to do with the America’s Cup event.

I also have trouble believing that Dirk de Ridder could have approved changes to a boat without higher authority approval. I am pleased for Dirk de Ridder.

 

Dirk De Ridder Suspension Reduced To 18 Months By The CAS
Lausanne, Switzerland: The Dutch sailor and former member of Oracle Team USA, Dirk de Ridder, has had his three-year suspension reduced to 18 months by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Mr de Ridder filed an appeal at the CAS in June 2014 against the decisions taken by the Disciplinary Commission (DC) of the International Sailing Federation (ISAF) and the ISAF Review Board in relation to the sailor’s alleged involvement in the manipulation of the weight distribution of AC45 yachts used in the inaugural America’s Cup World Series (ACWS) and the 2013 America’s Cup. The ISAF DC found that he had committed a gross breach of the rule which requires boats to comply with class rules, as well as of good sportsmanship, had brought the sport into disrepute and was therefore open to sanction. The ISAF Review board concurred and imposed a period of ineligibility of three years.

In appealing to the CAS, Mr de Ridder sought to overturn such decisions on the grounds that they were based on insufficient evidence, that the imposed sanction was disproportionate and that the ISAF lacked jurisdiction.

The CAS Panel found that the ISAF had jurisdiction to issue its decisions, and also found, to its comfortable satisfaction, that Mr de Ridder gave instructions, express or implied, to add weight to the forward king post of boat 4 at the Newport Regatta, part of the ACWS competition, held in June/July 2012. However, with respect to the sanction, the Panel found that a period of ineligibility of 3 years was disproportionate in light of the circumstances of the case and compared to previous sanctions imposed by the sailing federation in similar matters.

ADEQUATE RECEPTION?

UPDATE: could this be the reason?  http://soc.li/SpokbEE

 

 

Many of my sailing friends have been saying all along that the next America’s Cup in San Francisco was ill conceived. Thoughout the process the rules have been very fluid; many excused the changes because the changes to the event were so dramatic. 

San Francisco is being shortchanged and the America’s Cup is as well.


Dean Barker shares his thought on the strange latest AC manuvering in the AC

Today the Event organisers dropped a bombshell on the Americas Cup competitors when they announced they will no longer be requiring the Teams to be based on Piers 30 and 32, and more importantly would not be paying for any redevelopment of the Piers as has been promised for the last 18 months.

I am sitting here completely stunned. We are a little over 6 months from relocating our base to San Fran to what we have been told would be a fully functioning base area complete with Team hospitality spaces and full access for the public to watch the teams preparing and launching their boats. It is now going to be a concrete slab with absolutely nothing on it which will now require us to secure cranes, jettys, and all services required to function. We have never budgeted for this and to be dropped on us now is quite unbelievable.

I have to say we are a long long way from the vision presented to us back in September 2010. Larry Ellison has done a lot for this AC and has put a lot of his own financial resource into making the Americas Cup next year a big event. However I think in terms of a lot of decisions made along the way by different people here we are with only 3 challengers and now no base facility to operate out of. This is a long way from the success of 2007 in Valencia no matter how you package it.

The catamarans are great but the AC72’s are just way too expensive. Not only is the design and build of the new boats extreme, but then you need a small army just to launch and retrieve the boat each day let alone the work to maintain it.
There is no question the AC72 racing next year will be spectacular. That is fortunate because the rest of the show looks to be well below expectations.

TWO BOATS FOR SALE

Featured Brokerage
Featured Brokerage Boat27′ Goetz 1/3 Scale IACC Yachts (2). US$ 60,000. Located In Newport, Rhode Island, USA.

When preparing for the 2000 America’s cup in New Zealand, the BMW/Oracle syndicate was having trouble getting enough time in the wind tunnel to test sail shapes and the costs were escalating. They hit upon the idea of designing a building to 1/3 scale models for on the water testing. Set up to be sailed by two people, they have all the sophisticated sail and mast controls of the full size boats and the mast placement in the boat can be varied for and aft.

Carbon fiber laminated hull and deck. Lead keel bulb with steel shank. Carbon fiber rudder and tiller. Exterior of hull and keel painted black.

Brokerage through Sparkman & Stephens, Inc.:
www.yachtworld.com/sparkmanandstephens/

Complete listing details and seller contact information at
uk.yachtworld.com

THE AMERICA’S CUP HEADING BACK TO COURT?

Cory Friedman has written, as always, a fine provocative article concerning the possibility of the America’s Cup heading back to court: click here.

Briefly, the African Diaspora Maritime Corporation has filed a complaint in the New York Supreme Court alleging the the Golden Gate Yacht Club improperly prevented them from participating in the America’s Cup series.

I think we have all had the feeling that the America’s Cup had gone astray from it’s sailing roots. It has had a checkered past; if one look’s closely at the history of the event.

The New York Yacht Club, in the 12 meter years, despite the criticism, they received, had tried to be good custodians and preserve the event as set out in the deed of gift.

While it remains to be seen what the court will say about this latest challenge, Larry Ellison’s behavior, if we care, has been one of a spoiled child. He is after all used to getting his way.

 

DEAN BARKER SPEAKS

Dean Barker is someone, while I do not know him strikes me as a really solid sailor, with his head squarely on his shoulders, so when he speaks on the subject of the America’s Cup I am inclined to listen.
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2011
Dean Barker: “We’re about winning the America’s Cup”38-year old skipper Dean Barker and his team Emirates Team New Zealand (ETNZ) currently sit at the top of the leaderboard of the America’s Cup World Series Championship with 38 points (19 scored in match racing, 19 in fleet racing), just four points ahead of Oracle Racing Spithill. With the third and final World Series event for 2011 just around the corner, Barker updated Sailblast on ETNZs training progress…as well as shared some thoughts on the new AC game…
What was one thing that you took away from racing AC45s in the recent in events in Cascais & Plymouth?
The biggest eye opener is the maneuverability and how the racecourse and boundaries operate. It makes the racing just so much tighter and more emphasis on crew work and boat handling than ever before.
Emirates Team NZ (ETNZ) did extremely well – what do you attribute your strength to this early in the game?
We were really happy with our performance. We know we can sail a hell of a lot better but I’m sure like all the teams you make a lot of mistakes around the course but it’s a challenge with these boats in tough conditions and close quarters with other teams. It’s going to be hard to sail at a high level.
We’ve put a lot of effort into our crew work and boat handling and that’s paid dividends. I think during the period in Auckland we’re a bit off the pace. At our first crack at the soft sails, they were good but not good enough so we’ve developed our sails – we’re into our second generation and that’s been a big improvement in our speed. We feel like we’re a lot more competitive now against Oracle who in Auckland who had quite a big jump it felt over the rest of us. We’ve made some good gains there. But we’ve worked really hard on things like getting around the corners and being able to react in all different situations around the course. That’s been a big strength.
How are you preparing for San Diego?
To be honest we’ve been pretty full on working with boat design for the 72. San Diego is rolling around pretty quickly so we will need to get our heads back in the game for racing but we have a few practice days there before racing proper starts so that’ll give us an opportunity to get back into it all. We’ve been doing a bit of sailing back here in Auckland on the 33s as obviously like everyone else, except Oracle who have a couple of extras, our 45 is en route to San Diego.
How’s the transition to the multihull been for you?
I’ve been sailing multis now for a year and it’s amazing. It feels like the progress that we’ve made since we came last in Almeria in the Extreme Series last year. It feels like we’re making some really good progress. I’d say it’s still not necessarily instinctive like monohull sailing was. There’re times when you know what you want to do but you can’t quite make it happen instinctively. But it’s coming – it just takes time to reprogram yourself to adjust to different situations where things happen very very quickly. You have to be able to make decisions a lot quicker than in the monos. But it’s all a really good challenge.
Who is your back-up skipper?
We’re a pretty small sailing team at the moment. We really don’t have a lot of back-ups in any position to be honest! Depending on who is injured at any time we’ve got cover by three grinders and a few others who aren’t sailing on the boat.
When will ETNZ expand its sailing team?
That’s about it really. We’re not going to have two 72s. We just don’t have the resources to do it. It’s too expensive to take two 72s off the dock and go two-boat testing. It’s an expensive game we’re in and to take two 72s sailing, you’d need an army of people. There’s probably only one team that’s in that position right now.
Where are you at in the 72 design/build process?
We’re in the final stages of our design. What we’re learning pretty quickly is that the more you learn the more you don’t know! You just have to try to narrow in on the first design. The good thing is that we’re making good progress, the hard thing to know is what is the level you’ll need to be at in 2013. The learning curve makes it seem like we’ve got a long way to go but we’re at a level where we think we’ll be competitive enough. We have a design group of about 30 people we draw from including Pete Melvin, Scott Graham, Luc Du Bois – there’s a bunch of guys who are contributing. Cookson’s will build the hull and structures, and Southern will build a lot of our wing and wing components.
Who is developing your sails/sailplan?
We’ve done most of sail development in-house so far. We get a lot of input off the chase (boat) and evaluate our sails against where the opposition is. Oracle is by far the most experienced in these boats and have sailed them more than everybody else and have probably built more sails than the rest of us. You’re always looking to measure yourself against where they’re at and the direction they’re going. But, we’re pretty happy with the choices and development we’ve made.
What are some things you can see from the 45 that will translate to the 72?
The 45 is a nicely balanced boat, it’s fun to sail, it’s relatively easy to sail compared to the more traditional X-40 type designs, it’s quite a robust boat and seems to perform well across a variety of conditions. We’ve learned a lot just from sailing that but it is limited in a lot of ways. It’s got straight boards, it doesn’t have any real lifting component, it gets limited by wind speed, it’s a bit hard to push up the range but it’s a fantastic boat for learning about multi hull and sailing with a wing.
The 72 is a hugely more powerful boat. When you scale the 45 up to a 72 boat, it’s quite underpowered. The challenges that are going to go with the size of the 72 are pretty daunting. The boats in a strong breeze are going to be animals. They’ll be very hard to sail in SF conditions and you’ll certainly have to have your wits about you to get around the course. They’ll have capability of very high speed and you’re going to have to be really in tune to sail with them well.
What’s different about this Cup Campaign for ETNZ?
Apart from the obvious, lifestyle and scenery, it’s adapting to a different world. We’ve moved from a world of detailing and fine tuning to one of complete new world of open book, fresh paper design. Any ideas are certainly worth consideration. There are no stupid questions or ideas right now. With this multihull world, we’re just scratching the surface of a huge unchartered territory. It’s not even like a new design rule within the monohull environment.
Do you think it was entirely necessary to move up to the 72 for the real deal in 2013, or do you think a successful Cup could be staged in the 45?
Well, the 45 would really detract from what the essence of what the America’s Cup is about. It has always been a design race. I think to take away that aspect of the Cup would be a tragedy. It’s about managing so many different aspects of a campaign for a successful America’s Cup. When you get it right, then rightfully you deserve to win the America’s Cup. From a sailor’s point of view, one design racing is great because in the end the best team wins. There’s no argument about who had the better boat. It comes down to who sailed the best. So, there’s two schools of thought but in some ways I still believe in the traditional values of the Cup. It’s about managing a whole lot of different aspects: design, sailing team, campaign management and just getting to the start line. I still think it’s the right move that we’re racing in a development boat in the America’s Cup.
If Oracle was so committed to keeping costs down for AC34, how could they then go buy four AC45s while the other teams have only one? What’s ETNZ’s position on this?
There’s no way Oracle is committed to keeping costs down. It’s a complete fallacy that they’re trying to keep costs down. It’s absolute bullshit. The whole idea of this next America’s Cup was to try to make it more affordable for the teams. I can tell you right now that the budget for doing this campaign is at least what we spent last time and you can do it for less but you just don’t have a chance to perform. It’s a complete joke if they can sit back and say it costs less money, it’s not. It’s way more expensive. But that’s the game we’re in. If you want a crack at winning the America’s Cup you have to play by the rules and these rules are more expensive.
* Ed’s note: America’s Cup Race Management (ACRM) does not limit the teams’ training outside of World Series events, for instance, some teams will sail as soon as boats are off the ship in San Diego and others will opt not to sail until closer to the start of racing. And, any team can purchase an additional AC45 for training…assuming that they can afford to.
If ETNZ knew what it knows now before you signed up, do you think you guys may have given this next one a miss?
Definitely not. Emirates Team NZ exists for the America’s Cup and we’ve weathered the storm since 2007 to give ourselves the opportunity to compete in the 2013 event. You can’t afford to sit out, it’s just too hard to come in green and expect to get straight on the pace. If you miss a cycle, with all the development you’ll never catch it back up. It’s too much time. We decided that whatever the direction the Cup took that we’d contemplate it seriously, evaluate whether we could raise the money and give it a really good go at winning it. We’re not it in to make up the numbers, we’ve only entered because we think we can put up a challenge with a team that’s good enough to win. Time will tell if that’s the case. But, we’re a team that’s about winning the America’s Cup.
Much of the excitement over the 45, particularly for the non-sailing fan, is thanks to the crash factor. We wont (hopefully) see that with the 72. Without the crashes do you think the event will remain interesting for the non-sailor?
There’ll be an element who tune in to just watch the crashes, looking for the capsize or the collision. Those people you’ll try to capture – you have to accept that there’ll be that element. Hopefully people will be interested in watching the racing for what it is as well and we’ll be able to capture a new interested audience. In the short-term while there’s still a lot of spectacular action that’s going to motivate people to watch. It’s no different to the X-40s – the biggest hits come with the best action.
Do you think a nationality rule would help the AC grow as a fan sport?
I think it helps countries identify with their teams. We’ve got other nationalities involved in our team but it’s still pretty much all NZ, which certainly helps our fan base within NZ and the support we get as opposed to some of the other teams. Even though they may represent the US, Sweden and so on, they’re not true national teams to the degree we are.
How does your family take your busy lifestyle?
Fortunately my wife Mandy is really good with it all because I’m a bit of an absentee dad at times. I have four kids – 3 girls and a boy between six and one. It’s a lot of fun, never a dull moment. You feel like you leave one circus and go home to another one!
What’s your other business and how do you find time for that while still running a top AC team?
My primary focus is with the team so I spend the majority of my time sailing and working with the design group when I’m not traveling to events. When I do have a little down time I try to keep up to speed with Kiwi Yachting Consultants, a company I’m involved with in NZ, and also Nexus Marine which marine electronics company in Sweden.
When do you expect to be moving full-time to SF?
As a team we wont go up to San Francisco – mainly because of cost – until April/May 2013 full-time. We’ll be there next year for the events in August and September which will be great. I’m absolutely looking forward to sailing on the Bay, I’ve done a little bit of sailing there but not much. It’ll be an amazing spectacle for sure.

A LITTLE GOSSIP

If anyone cares to look, there may be a pattern of behavior here. (an internet search of Larry Ellison might prove interesting to the curious)

Pacific Heights: Larry Ellison Buys House Next Door for $40M, Shrubbery Fracas Settled

Tuesday, May 31, 2011, by Philip Ferrato

The latest twist in our tale of Mother Nature and the distress she causes among mere mortals: Curbed SF intel says Oracle CEO Larry Ellison will buy the home of late socialite/fashionista/philanthropist Dodie Rosekrans at 2840 Broadway- immediately next door to his- for $40,000,000. The Rosekrans’ extravagant Willis Polk-designed house, built in 1916, has twenty-two rooms and lacks a garage, but it does have unobstructable views of the bay. And the billionaire’s multi-year battle with his downhill neighbors/millionaires Jane and Bernard von Bothmer may be finally coming to a close. Apparently settled yesterday morning, with lawyers beavering away over the holiday weekend, the case is a log-book of Dickensian wrangling over an eighty-year-old acacia and some overly-enthusiastic redwoods and just how many feet of wood would get trimmed from their tops. Meanwhile, there’s been an attempt to landmark the acacia, plus during a recent deposition, Jane von Bothmer produced photos of Ellison’s employees illicitly strapped into her trees, ready to trim.

This past week, Ellison defended himself in the Wall Street Journal via his tree lawyer, and back in 2007, the von Bothmers turned down two offers from Ellison to buy their property. Having paid $6,900,000 for their house in 2004, renovating it and the garden extensively, the barnacle-like von Bothmers refused to be scraped away, but they have now agreed to maintain the redwoods at a height within two feet of the elevation of the yachtsman’s second floor.

The von Bothmer’s Mediterranean style house on Vallejo Street (not visible from the street) was designed by George Applegarth and built in 1925; it has a later garden by Thomas Church that was revised by another owner to be especially hummingbird-friendly. Back up on Broadway, the austere brown facade of the Rosekrans house hides an extravagant interior and a reproduction of a Spanish Rennaissance patio. In the 1970’s the Rosekrans hired Michael Taylor to decorate the interiors and Dodie apparently never changed a thing, although we expect it’s been emptied out since her death last year- her Picassos were sold earlier in May at Sotheby’s. In the gallery above, vintage shots, including Ellison’s new view, culled from Diane Dorran Saeks’s design blog The Salon Styliste. Ellison’s house was designed by William Wurster in 1958 for Anna Spreckels Coleman, but it’s been so extensively renovated there’s not much Wurster left. It does, however, have a three-car garage.

 

FRIDAY THE 13TH FOR THE AMERICA’S CUP

A symptom of too much change? Or simply of time zones? The Challenger of Record “Mascalzone Latino” has withdrawn from the America’ Cup. The position of the challenger of record is an important one. It is their job to co ordinate with the defender, in this case “Oracle” on almost all aspects of how the regatta would be conducted: and to represent the challengers as a group in this process. Vincent Onorato’s statement is below.

We could speculate about the “real” reasons for the withdrawal of the “Rascals”. Anyone who has been following the news of the America’s Cup has seen that Larry Ellison has gotten his way almost without interruption so far. Given his reputation it would not be hard to imagine that there has been little co operation.  I would still contend that Europe would be a better venue for the America’s Cup;  particularly in it’s present form.

The total number of teams is presently fourteen.

Dear Friends and Supporters,

with deep sorrow I have to announce my decision to withdraw my team from the 34th America’s Cup.

Since the very beginning of our role as Challenger of Record, I have been working on this project focused to bring the Cup in our Country.

Larry deeply loves Italy and he was excited about this idea. The Cup in Italy would have been the greatest worldwide promotion for our beautiful coasts. There have been some very high level and important meetings that made us believing in this dream, but the things went in a different way.

“As Challenger of Record, we have worked with humility next to Oracle and I am satisfied of the result we have reached: a new Cup, spectacular, with new boats, the catamarans, that will launch on the international scene a new generation of sailors.

With Russell we have discussed for long time on the most difficult challenge that the next Cup must face: an international situation with big economic crisis and therefore huge difficulties to find sponsor. This is the only, true, real enemy of the next Cup. We have then thought of the idea to create the class AC45, a concrete way to make lot of teams get involved in the event reducing costs, at least in the delicate period of the start-up.

On our side, I must thank the two Italian sponsors that believed and confirmed us their trust. We are not able, however, to reach a budget that allows us to be a competitive team.

In our sport, men in blazer have overcome by now those in oilskins, I’m a man in oilskin and when I go in the sea, I want to win. I’m not interested in a hopeless challenge, I would lie to the sponsors, to our fans and last but not least also to myself.

I would like to thank our friends from Club Nautico di Roma. I am sure that we will have new exciting adventures together.

The sailing adventure of Mascalzone Latino doesn’t end anyway with the Cup, but it continues with the sailing school in Naples, free of charge, for those children coming from the most difficult areas of this town. A daily challenge, and, who knows, maybe someday we will see a new America’s Cup champion coming out from one of them.

Fair wind to all of you.”

 

HOW SAN FRANCISCO GOT THE CUP (OR BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR)

Published on San Francisco Examiner (http://www.sfexaminer.com)
Home > America’s Cup deal was sweetened to bring race to San Francisco
America’s Cup deal was sweetened to bring race to San Francisco

Comments (2)
Into the future: The Oracle Racing team and The City negotiated a last-minute deal that was more favorable for billionaire Larry Ellison and gained him flexibility. (Getty Images file photo
Larry Ellison had more to celebrate on the evening of Dec. 31 than the coming new year. The deal his yacht racing team signed that afternoon to bring the America’s Cup race to San Francisco in 2013 was much sweeter than the one The City floated just weeks before.

In negotiations with The City that occurred after the billionaire’s team made good on a threat to begin simultaneous negotiations with Rhode Island, Oracle Racing secured several potentially lucrative concessions.

The changes included elimination of a guarantee that The City would earn a small share of the revenues from the sale of condominiums to eventually be constructed on a waterfront property south of the Bay Bridge.

The City also clarified how it will get the state to lift restrictions on the 2-acre property so it can be sold outright to Ellison’s development team. And that team now has more flexibility about what it does with the $55 million it has agreed to invest in city property.

On Dec. 14, after a host of last-minute changes, the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a host-city agreement that gave the mayor wiggle room to keep negotiating as long as The City wouldn’t have to spend any extra money. Yet the approval didn’t prohibit city officials from negotiating away potential income.

Ellison’s team won the America’s Cup in February, including the power to decide where the next race would be held.

Ellison said he’d like to bring the race to San Francisco Bay, and his team spent 10 months negotiating with San Francisco over a host-city agreement.

Port of San Francisco officials wouldn’t comment on whether the dalliance with Rhode Island was used as leverage to get more from The City. However, Port Special Projects Manager Brad Benson said the team desired greater certainty of return on its investment.

The final deal also allows the team to recoup its money if it invests more than $55 million. Developers are guaranteed 66-year leases if they invest at least $10 million in Pier 28 and $15 million in Pier 26.

In exchange for these concessions, Benson said The City received a promise that the team would invest the $55 million before 2013.

City Budget Analyst Harvey Rose, who has provided several critical analyses of prior drafts of the deal, said he would not be examining the final deal unless expressly asked to do so by the new Board of Supervisors.

kworth@sfexaminer.com

How the deal changed

The America’s Cup Host City Agreement changed between the version approved by the Board of Supervisors on Dec. 14 and the version finalized by the Mayor’s Office on Dec. 31. Here are some of the changes:

Reduces revenues: Deletes a provision from prior drafts that would have allowed the Port of San Francisco to earn a small share of the revenues created when condominiums on the site are sold.
Enables property transfer: Laid out The City’s duties to remove all legal restrictions on Seawall 330, so that Ellison’s Oracle Racing team can own the property free and clear, rather than having to lease it for 75 years.
Clarifies developer revenues: Creates a mechanism for The City to pay back the developer for certain improvements on the waterfront, bringing the property back under city control. Spells out and speeds up the timeline by which an infrastructure financing district — a district that would allow developers to collect local taxes for public improvements to the waterfront property they’ve developed — would be proposed.
Established rental rates: Sets rates for the long-term leases of Piers 30-32 as $4 per square foot, and of Piers 26 and 28 as $6 per square foot.