MORE CHANGES

There is clearly a desire for change. Vlad Murnikov’s 48 foot design has been chosen for the world match race tour. I will confess that I never envisioned such change coming. I am not saying that I did not wish for change, but I never could have predicted the direction.

The America’s Cup has taken it’s share of press for change; not the least of which was the move to multihulls. The following is a you tube video about the 45 footers which will be sailed for the first season at least of the America’s Cup competition.

ARE YOU TIRED OF THIS STORY YET?

For many of you this is the story of the America’s Cup. Stating the obvious; It’s about Television ratings. The rules of sailing have been altered to keep the flow. The races will likely not last more than a few hours at most. It fact the America’s Cup seems to be everything that Peter Wilson (a former America’s Cup sailor himself) was writing against.( see the previous entry)

The Cup is about money, not sport. Is it possible to reconcile the direction the Cup has taken and the direction sailors would like to see the sport take? I don’t see how. These forces are purposefully tugging in opposite directions. What is there to be done? Probably nothing, but to wait and see.  The professional arm of sailing, for me is separating itself more and more from the sport as we know it. Is this a bad thing? All other sports have professional arms that operate independently from their respective sport; so why not sailing?  Are we simply watching the growing pains of an emerging professional sport? I guess we shall see.

San Francisco needs to tell a new story for an America’s Cup win

San Francisco Business Times – by Patrick Twohy

Date: Friday, March 18, 2011, 1:31pm PDT – Last Modified: Friday, March 18, 2011, 2:20pm PDT

Enlarge Image

pastedGraphic.pdf

Photo: I Wilkins via Artemis Sailing

A Bay Area kid, Paul Cayard, is skipper of the Swedish team challenging for the America’s Cup.

pastedGraphic_1.pdf

  1. Patrick Twohy
  2. Senior Editor
  1. Email: ptwohy@bizjournals.com

S.F. has won the right to stage the next America’s Cup. So what?

Pulling off the same old white-shoe event custom made for a bunch of smug-looking stuffy old gents and their mega-millions won’t cut it.

Fortunately, no one here wants that. People here, particularly those associated with America’s Cup Event Authority and the city of San Francisco’s side of the deal, know this is a huge chance bring the America’s Cup and San Francisco as a major sailing venue to potentially millions of new fans.

But good intentions alone won’t turn around very traditional ways of doing things in a very old sport.

So how do you tell this story to new readers and viewers?

San Francisco and the America’s Cup Event Authority have to fundamentally reinvent not just the America’s Cup but sailing itself, partly in the minds of participants but mostly in the minds of those they hope to attract, particularly in the United States.

But what kind of story do you tell?

It’s all about the story

Given the massive click numbers on anything we post about the America’s Cup, it’s clear that Business Times readers understand the Cup is fundamentally a business story. That’s a good place to start — the business of America is business and all that.

But how do you get the attention of a broader U.S. public for whom watching golf on TV seems more exciting. (Golf on TV? Really? Isn’t there anything on the Paint Drying channel?)

For the tech-leading Bay Area, the America’s Cup is, among other things, a huge technology story.

It’s about how a remarkable — and remarkably simple — design made a sailboat that goes faster than the wind. Faster than you can safely drive through the S-curve on the Bay Bridge (especially if you’re hoping to catch a glimpse of the racing). Faster even than a U.S. Navy destroyer.

It’s a story about people like Stan Honey, a master navigator and Bay Area sailing icon who, not coincidentally, is also the inventor of the first-down-line technology that anyone who has watched football on TV is familiar with. He has been enlisted to help bring America’s Cup racing to life for the world’s TV viewers.

It’s about personalities

It’s a story about huge personalities (and egos), of course. Dozens of ’em. Start with Oracle Racing boss Larry Ellison. Then move to Paul Cayard, the Bay Area local kid (a graduate of Crestmoor High in San Bruno) who is CEO and skipper of Sweden’s bid to win the Cup.

It’s a story of many things. But there are a few things this story is NOT.

This is NOT primarily a sports story. Yes, the America’s Cup involves struggling against odds, challenging one’s self and one’s team to overcome, bringing your A game; giving 110 percent. Yada, yada. Snore.

Sports pages and websites are already full. If that’s the only place — or even the primary place — you’re looking for attention, well, best of luck to you.

Arrgh, drop the weird sailor talk

And surely, telling this story will have to involve NOT speaking the arcane language that sailors use to describe what they do.

Sailors speak of speeds in knots, directions in starboard and port, wind as pressure, turning as “coming about” — it’s like Steve Martin once said of the French, they have a different word for everything.

In some cases, those terms describe something more accurately than standard vocabulary can, the way “lateral” and “hail Mary” describe different ways of throwing a football. But in many cases, the only purpose sailors-only terminology serves is as a secret sailing handshake to keep the uninitiated out. Avast ye lubbers!

Hey kids, this is your chance at the bigtime. Climb down from your tree fort and join the rest of us. Tell us how fast boats are going in miles per hour. When they turn, it’s right or left, please. Wind is wind — not pressure. Or you’ll lose, no matter who wins the Auld Mug.

There are many ways the Bay Area and sailing could blow this chance to turn sailing into a more mainstream sport. One of the most obvious would be to inadvertently limit this to a story for people like me who already like sailing. And this chance is really much bigger than that.

Read more: San Francisco needs to tell a new story for an America’s Cup win | San Francisco Business Times

ECONOMIC TSUNAMI FOR SAN FRANCISCO?

The Tsunami is barely over and the world keeps turning. This article should come as no surprise to those of you who are familiar with the America’s Cup.  But Newport should count their lucky stars that they were not successful. ( Governor Chaffee gave his state of the state address this past week and is looking for ways to close a large budget gap)

written by John Cote for the  San Francisco Chronicle

(03-11) 04:00 PST San Francisco (03-11) 10:10 PST — San Francisco agreed to a deal that could cost the city millions more dollars to host the next America’s Cup regatta than the one the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved in December, according to a disputed report from the board’s budget analyst released Thursday.

San Francisco’s final agreement to host the prestigious sailing races was negotiated between race organizers and outgoing Mayor Gavin Newsom’s administration and port officials in the final days of 2010. The agreement was materially changed from the version the Board of Supervisors had approved two weeks earlier, despite city officials’ assurances that the agreement had not been fundamentally changed, the report by Budget and Legislative Analyst Harvey Rose said.

“We ratified a decent deal, but the proposal changed significantly by Dec. 31” said Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who commissioned the report. “The impact of those changes have been completely unknown until now, and those who negotiated on behalf of the city have some serious explaining to do. There were substantial increases in obligations and liabilities for the city.”

Members of the city’s negotiating team vigorously defended the final agreement Thursday, noting changes had been approved by the city attorney’s office. They also said Rose’s report was faulty.

“We tried to be fully transparent about the changes as soon as the negotiations were complete,” said Jennifer Matz, head of the mayor’s office of economic and workforce development. “The changes did not go beyond the scope of what we were authorized by the board to do.”

The deal approved by the board on Dec. 14 allowed for further modifications that did not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the city. Rose’s report said that “some of the modifications represent material changes in process from what was approved (at the board).” Other changes could have “a material impact on port revenues and costs.”

Matz said she agreed with much in Rose’s report, but ultimately the changes did not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the city as a whole.

The race is expected to bring more than $1 billion to the local economy, and the deal gives race organizers, led by billionaire Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, long-term development rights to up to three piers and another waterfront parcel in exchange for paying at least $55 million to shore up aging piers to house race facilities.

With a $55 million infrastructure investment, race organizers will receive development rights and a 66-year lease on piers 30-32, a single conjoined pier, and the deal commits the city to obtaining state approval to transfer title to Seawall Lot 330 across the Embarcadero to race organizers.

The team will also have the option of paying at least $25 million more to shore up nearby piers 26 and 28 in exchange for 66-year leases on them. It will also have the option of developing piers 16, 23, 27, 29 and 80 if the team’s improvements exceed $55 million and the city agrees to the development.

The report said the board did not agree to giving race organizers the right to unilaterally establish a long-term lease on Pier 29 or to changing the calculations for the rent race organizers would pay from a fair-market system to one locked in at $4 or $6 per square foot. Supervisors also did not sign off on the deal involving Seawall lot 330. The negotiated provision calls for the city to transfer the title of that parcel to race organizers. If that doesn’t happen, the city would lease that land to race organizers for 75 years for $565,000 per year, which is the same rent the port currently receives from a parking lot.

Rose, in an interview, said there were too many variations to give a total dollar amount that the changes represent for city coffers. One change – not requiring rent payments on Piers 30-32 because race organizers have committed to completing $55 million in infrastructure improvements – could result in the loss of about $2.2 million a year if race organizers are reimbursed for the $55 million through the rent credits and still owe rent, the report said.

Brad Benson, a port official and a central figure in the negotiations, said “the budget analyst is incorrect” in asserting race organizers had a unilateral right to lease Pier 29.

“It’s not a unilateral right,” he said.

A spokeswoman for race organizers said she had not reviewed the report and couldn’t comment.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/03/10/BAL51I8SQ0.DTL#ixzz1GL5wWwOf

WHO IS PAYING FOR THE AMERICA’S CUP?

Footing the bill for the America’s Cup still an issue

Comments (0)

pastedGraphic.pdfScrounging up cash: The America’s Cup Organizing Committee and the America’s Cup Event Authority are tasked with raising a total of $300 million for the yacht race. (Getty Images file photo)

On the America’s Cup to-do list for the next two years: Make plans and review the heck out of them. Demolish some buildings, build others. Design and erect yachts, then race them. Attract hundreds of thousands of people and then entertain them. And what else?

Oh yeah — pay for it all.

Two entities — the America’s Cup Organizing Committee and the America’s Cup Event Authority — are tasked with raising a total of $300 million.

Six weeks after San Francisco was chosen to host the 2013 race, neither has yet raised a dime — mostly because they have been trying to hammer out who is responsible for raising what — a question that, until Friday, elicited different answers from each agency at this point.

On Friday, the leaders of both entities sent in a statement saying they consider “the entire 300M a shared responsibility” and that ever since The City won its bid to host the event “we have worked jointly to raise this money and are aligned in our fundraising efforts.”

But just the day before, Mark Buell, the chairman of the ACOC, a nonprofit volunteer board made up of mostly local business and government leaders, said his organization needs to raise about 10 percent of the $300 million total. That $32 million raised by ACOC will cover the city of San Francisco’s costs, which will come in the form of police security, transportation and environmental review. The rest would mostly be left up to the for-profit Event Authority, mostly through sponsorship contracts and TV rights.

At the time, Craig Thompson, CEO of the Event Authority, contradicted Buell and said the ACOC is contractually obligated to raise all $300 million, and the Event Authority is simply helping them.

“If you look at the contract, San Francisco’s Organizing Committee has an obligation to deliver $270 million to the event, plus the $32 million to offset city costs. …. We’re the ones who get big companies to understand why they should put their money into this — it’s a good investment for them,” Thompson said.

But in an e-mail the following day, Thompson changed his tune: “Since San Francisco won the right to be the host city for the 34th America’s Cup, we have worked jointly to raise this money, and are aligned in our fundraising efforts.”

Asked how confident he is that the ACOC will be able to raise the money for the event, Buell laughed.

“I don’t sleep at night, thanks for asking,” he joked. “Really, I do wake up at 2 in the morning, trying to figure out if we can really do it.”

The first sign that the America’s Cup is coming to town could be apparent as soon as next month, when the massive trimaran that won the last Cup is displayed on The City’s waterfront.

The massive racing yacht is currently being shipped from Spain to San Francisco. Its mast is so tall that it can’t fit under the Golden Gate Bridge, so it has been taken off the ship and will be reassembled once it arrives.

Last week, Mayor Ed Lee said it’s yet to be determined where the yacht will be displayed, but he said it is expected to play a part in the fundraising drive for the event.

Sponsorship will bring in the bucks

Those who can afford to cough up millions of dollars for America’s Cup sponsorship will be able to watch the event at close range: from the boat itself.

The America’s Cup Event Authority, a for-profit entity billionaire boat racer Larry Ellison created to put on the event, has set up three tiers of sponsorship: a global partner, a global sponsor and a national sponsor. Each tier will accommodate just six sponsors, and will guarantee different levels of advertising and branding.

Event Authority CEO Craig Thompson wouldn’t say how much the tiers cost, but said that an independent media valuation firm pegged the value of the top sponsorship at $74 million — but the authority will discount that cost significantly.

Companies that fork over for that highest tier will have their names branded on the buoys around which the yachts will turn. They also secure TV sponsorship, room at the VIP sponsorship tent — and one lucky person will be strapped onto the boat during the race, he said.

kworth@sfexaminer.com

NEWPORT STILL PREPARING FOR THE AMERICA’S CUP

NEWPORT, R.I.—Gov. Lincoln Chafee says the state will help pay for infrastructure improvements needed so Newport can host sailing races that lead up to the America’s Cup finals.

The “pre-regattas” are planned for Newport and locations around the world before the final races in 2013 in San Francisco.

In Newport, Oracle Racing is planning races in the east passage of Narragansett Bay this year between Sept. 17-25. On Friday, Chafee toured Fort Adams State Park and told The Newport Daily News, the state “will do our part” to pay for upgrades needed to host the races there.

“I’m big on creating infrastructure,” he said. “It’s the role of government.”

Chafee said improvements at Fort Adams would pay for themselves by making future events possible there, and also by giving the park more visibility.

“Everyone who comes to Fort Adams, Rhode Island residents and those from outside the state, says how beautiful it is,” the governor said. “Anything that can open up this historic asset to more people is a big plus.”

Among the improvements needed: new docks along the waterfront, two cranes to hoist the catamarans in and out of the water, a barge for additional docking space and a long pier to protect the docking areas.

State funding is available for capital improvements to state parks, and the Department of Environmental Management has money to repave roads in state parks, said Paul Harden, the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation’s manager of business and workforce development.

He said Oracle and racing organizers will pay for items such as the cranes.

“We think some federal funding also may be available,” Harden said.

ANDREW MASON ON AMERICA’S CUP TECHNOLOGY

Here is a link to one of the more interesting articles about the future of America’s Cup. For me the America’s Cup is and has always been about cutting edge yacht design. Frankly the gossip and “politics” are never very interesting; one always hopes that it is about the sailing, however naive that may seem.

The only point I might find to disagree with is the idea that the “C” class catamarans would not be an important platform for development. I agree with his observation that the “C” class cats have been budget constrained and have not used CFD for development. The class will non-the-less be an important point of departure.

ANYONE ELSE NOTICE THE RHETORIC?

* From Robert Bausch: (re, story in Scuttlebutt 3253)

What is it with this guy Tom Ehman, is he trying to jinx the America’s Cup

being in San Francisco? Now that we feel good that it is, he seems to be

trying everything he can to cast doubt on it happening, complete with sly

comments like “… if, for any reason, the deal with San Francisco falls

apart…”. Doesn’t he get it, that the Cup is going to be in the City?

LITTLE RHODY

‘WE GOT PLAYED’ – THE SAGA OF LITTLE RHODY
By Herb McCormick, yachting journalist
Here in Rhode Island, like last year, and the one before that, it’s been an exceptionally crummy year. In his Saturday column for the Providence Journal, the state’s biggest paper, sportswriter Bill Reynolds summed it up thusly: “Let’s see: high unemployment (about 12% and climbing), the Central Falls school disaster, everyone talking about moving to North Carolina, fear and loathing everywhere you go in R.I. Slink out the door, 2010.”

I grew up here, in Newport, and my dad’s longtime bookie, Nickie C at the old Cliff Walk Manor, would’ve wished the year farewell in similar fashion with his favorite expression: “Don’t let the screen door hit you in the ass on the way out.”

So when the news came down late on New Year’s Eve that the America’s Cup had been awarded to San Francisco after an 11th hour bid by the state to lure it to Newport, it seemed like the inevitable capper to a crappy year. As I watched the new flash on the tube a single word leapt to mind: “Perfect.”

A more accurate analysis was put forth in the “comments” section of the online story in the next morning’s ProJo. It was the first in a long string of like-minded assessments from folks who don’t happen to live by the water and who saw through the sham from the outset. I can’t remember if it was Vinnie from Cranston or Paulie from Pawtucket or Rocco from Woonsocket but it doesn’t really matter. Vinnie or Rocco or whoever it was absolutely nailed it: “We got played.”

Yo, Vinnie. Truth, brother.

Over the holidays I watched an old Charlie Brown Christmas special with my daughter. I love the fact that the “adults” never actually speak…you know they’re saying something by the single, repeated, droning note of an oboe or something: “Wah, wah, wah…”

A lot of good people put a lot of effort into trying to bring the Cup “home,” and though I tried to tell everyone who brought it up that there was an EXTREMELY strong possibility that we were being used as a negotiating tool for the ongoing talks in San Fran (not to mention the fact that finding the money that was being bandied about in a state on the brink of insolvement was going to be, um, tricky), optimism was high. There is little hope in RI at the moment (ironically, “Hope” is the state’s motto), and the possibility of a flood of jobs and tourists and development was strong ju-ju. Like, man, we needed this. Bad.

And in the aftermath of the decision, a lot of politicians and an Oracle spokesman were quoted about how close we’d come, and how cool that was, and what little doucats we might get tossed our way if this or that might happen down the road. But it all sounded like a lecture to Linus to me: “Wah, wah, wah, wah, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.” Noise. More noise. Endless noise.

Anyway, congratulations San Francisco. You’ll put on a hell of a regatta in the prettiest city on the planet. Honestly, when we first heard that the Cup was coming to Northern California, we were overjoyed.

Then, suddenly and dramatically, we were part of the discussion, and we allowed ourselves the luxury of dreaming, hoping against hope we weren’t in the crossfires of shysters and soundbites.

But here in hapless Little Rhody, the song remains the same. We got played.