WHAT ARE THE PARAMETERS?

The following link is to a review of a book about Joshua Slocum.  It is interesting on a number of levels. The story, the judgment,

It led me to reflect on The America’s Cup Hall of Fame. There are stated parameters, but how do we interpret them? Is suitability judged on merits, ability and contributions to the America’s Cup Alone? Is there more  and is it subjective?

The obvious example is Pete Rose. It seems he will never be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame, despite his accomplishments. I do not follow baseball and only know this story from it’s newsworthyness (a word?) If the criteria is solely on the merits of his accomplishments in baseball it seems a foregone conclusion.

Back to the America’s Cup Hall of Fame; Alan Bond was inducted despite several stints in prison. If he was judged solely on his accomplishments in the America’s Cup, he was indeed deserving.  Simon Daubney accused and banned from sailing and subsequently reinstated, all for supposed drug use.

A number of people chose not to attend Simon Daubney’s induction, remaining unconvinced of his innocence. I do not have an opinion, I don’t know enough.

What I do question, however, Is that I can think of a number of people, who, in my opinion, merit induction, and to date have not been considered. So, what are the parameters?

Published by

ws lirakis

a sailor who carries a camera

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *